It's still a different license for each city, province, or organisation, and the current opinion is that each different license needs to go through the same multi-month review to be approved for OSM.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > T.B. have what they call a Municipal Open Data kit which basically has the > same license as the city of Ottawa uses plus how to use it. > > Cheerio John > > On 27 September 2017 at 18:40, Stewart Russell <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And >> anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month >> review. >> >> Stewart >> >> On Sep 27, 2017 18:28, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2 >>> >>> theres not much we can do from a legal stand point. ogl-ca v1 puts too >>> many restrictions >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2017 6:21 PM, "Matthew Darwin" <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a >>>> time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. >>>> >>>> On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to >>>>>> think >>>>>> about the project. >>>>>> >>>>> That sounds good. Despite some prodding, the Licence Working Group >>>>> (LWG) >>>>> hasn't got back to me with any updates on how they want to handle the >>>>> Toronto or Ontario licences. I first contacted them in March, so if it >>>>> takes them six months or more to look at the licence, then this import >>>>> is a multi year (if not multi-decade) project. Remember, LWG has >>>>> decided >>>>> that *every* Canadian licence variant needs their sign-off. >>>>> >>>>> Denis Carr (open data lead) from Toronto has been on board since the >>>>> spring, and I hope hasn't forgotten us. >>>>> >>>>> Toronto has nice building outlines (embedded in the 3D Massing data >>>>> set, >>>>> so we can pull out base elevation and height). We also have address >>>>> points already in the middle of buildings. >>>>> >>>>> It also is of great help that the Esri Community Imagery includes some >>>>> very nice municipal air photos for verification. >>>>> >>>>> Stewart >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-ca mailing list >>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca