I would still make the comment that it is a live map and even University
> students can get creative.
>
> I would recommend having someone go over the edits carefully.  Ideally an
> experienced validator.  Both from the point of view of accuracy and also to
> give feedback to the students.  If you're mapping in Canada be aware people
> will not welcome inaccurate mapping and can be quite vocal about it.  Don't
> assume because you are a teacher you know enough about the subject.
> Locally a University professor asked their students to add detail to the
> map but restrict it to on Campus.  They didn't restrict themselves and I
> believe both added and modified existing data incorrectly which took
> considerable clean up effort from a number of local mappers.
>
> The more flexibility you give the students the steeper the learning
> curve.  It takes about an hour before a new adult mapper feels comfortable
> adding building outlines.
>
> When working with Bjenk on the Canadian building project it was apparent
> that the building outline was only part of what they were after.
> Alessandro was the first person I've seen to accurately map a building
> outline in iD so it can be done. The other information they were after was
> the number of floors.  How many does a split level have by the way?  The
> use, commercial, residential etc.  Ask Alessandro nicely and he might even
> give you a list of what they are after.  StreetComplete runs on an Android
> smartphone and can be used to add this type of data.
>
> On the visually impaired side we have special tactile pads in the side
> walk at junctions but I haven't worked out how to map and tag them yet and
> I'm fairly experienced.
>
> If you go a HOT project then in theory they have validators on their
> projects.  Bug me nicely and I might even point you to one that is actively
> validated.
>
> The following maybe of interest.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Education
>
> The links contained give access to people who have done it before.
>
> Cheerio John
>
>
>
>
>
> On 23 January 2018 at 23:30, keith hartley <keith.a.hart...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>> I work with a GIS users group in Manitoba (MGUG.ca) and we were talking
>> about how to use OSM as a learning tool for high school students as well.
>> From our education sub-committee we discussed that building footprints or
>> adding roads doesn't add to what the provincial high school geo subject
>> curriculum needs. One suggestion was rather then adding new data and
>> supervising edits, we can augment the map to be more detailed. (better
>> trails, active transport, or building accessibility for disabled people)
>>
>> One example  would be addressing mobility and accessibility around the
>> school. If we could get a few high schools within an area to participate,
>> we could could add buildings that are accessible via ramps ect, or maybe
>> signaled crosswalks. That information could show the students issues that
>> vision impaired, or mobility restricted people face, while at the same time
>> improving the map. (similar to wheel map https://wheelmap.org)
>>
>> We're still at the discussion stage, but just a thought!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to