The issue here is that Brampton replaced it's incompatible license
(mostly), with CC-BY 4.0, which needs an explicit waiver and there
currently isn't one.
Hence why Kevin suggested using the data from StatsCan
wolfy1339
On 27/11/2025 4:03 pm, William Davis via Talk-ca wrote:
For what it’s worth, I requested a review of Niagara’s licence from
the LWG and it was approved at their next meeting; I suspect this one
would also be a (fairly) quick approval if the only change is the name
of the municipality.
—
William
On Nov 24, 2025, at 13:16, John Whelan <[email protected]> wrote:
Many Thanks, it's always better to review these things first.
Cheerio John
On 2025-11-24 12:34 p.m., Kevin Farrugia wrote:
Hey John,
The addresses are in the StatsCan data, as when I ran Peel's open
data they informed me they were pulling out addresses from our site
for their program.
If they pulled Peel's I don't see why they'd pull Brampton's
separately since Peel covers Brampton.
So they can use the SC addresses as a source but not Brampton's
since OSM LWG considers the city's name changing in the license to
be a new license.
*Kevin*
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025, 12:30 p.m. john whelan <[email protected]>
wrote:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GridRecce_Import/diary/407733
Does anyone know if the license works or if the data can be
pulled in from stats canada?
Thanks John
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
