Hi Gianfranco, Interesting that you chose to do not what Derek and I suggested, but instead use the "demolished:" prefix. Was there discussion elsewhere?
I'm nervous about my future of editing OSM if it fills up with old ghost buildings. I wonder, are you thinking that the objects should stay that way, or eventually be deleted? Best Dan 2016-08-08 10:33 GMT+01:00 gianfranco g <gfrem...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I live quite close to the Strand East Development in Newham > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48654733. > Several buildings in the area have been demolished. Neither Gmaps nor Bing > are updated. > The on the ground situation is that almost all the land between the three > mills river and the Lee Navigation south of the High street has been > cleared. > > Can someone explain which way they tagged areas and buildings that underwent > similar transformations in the last years? > A coherent tagging will create a useful source for people interested in > urban studies. > > Best > > Gianfranco > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-gb-london mailing list > Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london > _______________________________________________ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
