On 09/11/2009 14:21, David Earl wrote: > On 09/11/2009 14:05, Richard Moss wrote: >> I cycled Swavesey - St Ives yesterday afternoon, and entered some of >> the data last night. I did the bridleway rather than the actual >> busway, but have added some detail for the St Ives P&R. > > Great, thanks. We can easily add correct the guidway from > >> It's a bit messy in places because of the historic stuff that's on >> the map from before the construction work, and I'd be grateful for >> thoughts on whether things should be deleted (e.g. line of disused >> railway?) > > In theory it should be able to stay with that tag as well as > highway=bus_guideway but we'll see ho it renders. > >> Incidentally, I have tagged it as bridleway, because that's what it >> is (I encountered a horse!), but note that the Swavesey - Cambridge >> bit has been tagged as cycleway. Any thoughts? > > Definitely cycleway (with horse=yes): this will become the new NCN11 > shortly, so I think it is important it is marked as a cycleway - that > will be its principal use. > > Strictly speaking, and the reason we've got a cycleway at all, its > status is a maintenance track to allow access to the busway for > maintenance vehicles. But again that's ancillary in practice. > >> Can anyone advise how accurate the naptan bus-stop positions are? >> Looking at the P&R site, either they need to be moved north-east a >> bit, or my four traverses of this stretch are wrong. > > Your survey is likely to be more accurate I think. > > David > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-midanglia
