On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:58 PM, David Earl <da...@frankieandshadow.com>wrote:
> It's signposted as a bridleway (only the northern section), so it is > technically correct. On the basis of map whatbyou see on the ground, thats > a valid change. So long as it have bicycle=yes, and retains the NCN > information, I don't think it matters that much. Oliver is right though, > use by horses is essentially non existent. In visual terms, one might call > it a track, which happens to be designated a bridleway. It does render differently (I know, don't tag for the renderer, but it seems reasonable for a renderer to infer the primary use from the highway tag) If you're on a road bike you'd usually want to avoid anything that shows up as a brideway .. Taking a bike down http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/52724259 was interesting :) Oliver
_______________________________________________ Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-midanglia
