Brian wrote: > I've not changed any boundary WAYS as that is a massive job. I think that we > really don't need the ways any longer as the relations will get rendered, but > that's another discussion entirely and a tedious job to do. But perhaps we'd > better do it to avoid confusing software and humans
I've done it - my boundary analyser that generates the data for http://www.loach.me.uk/osm/boundaries/ allows me (when run manually rather than as a scheduled task) to open just the boundary ways which should have the specified admin level (but don't) in JOSM. I used to 'fix' these nationally on a fairly regular basis, decided they were optional, so stopped doing so. However, I believe it makes rendering easier if they are specified and 'correct' based on the boundary relations they are in. I've tried to restrict the ones I've changed today to just those in the West Midlands area, but may have got any that are in the same bbox but outside the region. I updated 47 ways: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28255092 Ed _______________________________________________ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
