I have now reverted this changeset - it went through cleanly and easily. BTW for reverts I do I'm using a different user id from my usual - GuardianAngel is me with a different hat on.
I wonder whether you could contact him again Peter and find out what he did that led him to believe he wasn't changing anything - we need to find out why people are making edits they think are harmless. Is the Potlatch edit live, or is there something in the non-live version that's misleading people into saving their edits. (I'm sure you'll be encouraging as well - it's terribly embarrassing for someone when they do this kind of thing). David On 13/09/2009 22:11, Peter Miller wrote: > I sent this message to Gothy.... > "I am doing some reviewing of Stratford upon Avon and notice that you > made some changes on the 31th August and moved various features around. > > "Was this based on sound local knowledge or were you experimenting? if > it was an experiment then it worked! The features have been moved and > we will need to move them back. > > "If I don't hear from you in the next 24 hours we will attempt to > revert the edit. > > "Regards, > > "Peter > > > > And got this response a few minutes later.... > > "Hi Peter, > > "I'm very sorry it was a complete mistake as I experimenting and > didn't realise the changes would be permanent. I didn't know how to > undo it and I hope it hasn't caused you too much inconvenience. > > "Huge apologies, > > > > > So... the message is that the undo feature may be used by people to > take out their own mistakes which is something we haven't discussed > until now. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
