> Hello Andy, > >>Couple of comments on that. Quite a lot of PROW within the urban sprawl. >>These being ways that have had to be adjusted and realigned when housing >>development extended, but at least were maintained as a route. > > True, though perhaps these aren't so important to show as most people > interested in using rights of ways are going to be using them in the > countryside. >
Whilst that's probably right, I notice that the boundaries of these urban areas are drawn very loosely and don't just exclude heavily urbanised areas, e.g. you have excluded quite a large proportion of what is essentially rural Cheshire due to its proximity to Manchester - but in reality much of it is very rural including some long-distance footpaths etc. All of the land between Liverpool and Manchester is missing, and only shows countour lines at closer zoom levels, not just the cities themselves. There's also a large void from Bridgnorth in Shropshire all the way to the North Sea near Lowestoft which cuts off a lot of rural areas. There is a large void in the North of England - which includes part of the Northumberland National Park. Are these voids intentional, or are they areas that haven't been rendered for whatever reason? _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
