Regarding the OS datasets, here is a suggestion: use it is to update the
name tag and fill in the missing gaps in attributes. For most of the
datasets, the quality of the positional information (that's the
geometry) is lower than that of OSM and it will make much more sense
just to identify where there are overlaps and a road can be recognised
quite well, so the attributes can be transferred...
Cheers
Muki
--
Dr. Muki Haklay: Senior Lecturer in GIS
Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering
University College London (UCL)
Gower St. London WC1E 6BT
T: +44 20 7679 2745
E: m.hak...@ucl.ac.uk <mailto:m.hak...@ucl.ac.uk>
W: http://www.ge.ucl.ac.uk/~mhaklay/ <http://www.ge.ucl.ac.uk/%7Emhaklay/>
Towards Successful Suburban Town Centres - www.sstc.ucl.ac.uk
<http://www.sstc.ucl.ac.uk/>
Bridging the Gaps - www.ucl.ac.uk/btg <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/btg/>
Mapping for Change - www.mappingforchange.org.uk
<http://www.mappingforchange.org.uk>
Po ve Sham blog - povesham.wordpress.com <http://povesham.wordpress.com>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
