On 07/04/10 20:18, Seventy 7 wrote: > What odd choices OS have made in releasing this data! I've not had a good > look until now, so I've only just realised that they've had all these layers > and decided which to release and which to remove.
StreetView is just an existing product - it's not something they've done specially for this data release. > So they've removed paths but kept their names, removed parks but kept the > water and wooded bits. I wonder what they were thinking and how they decided? Yes, cartographically speaking it's a complete mess for exactly the sort of reasons you mention. I can't imagine anybody much was buying it to be honest. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
