On 2 February 2011 21:10, Peter Miller <peter.mil...@itoworld.com> wrote:
> It could do the following: > > 1) Add names to existing roads in osm where there is a single un-named ways > in osm with a bounding box which matches that of a single entry in os > locator. > > 2) In addition... it might be able to also add roads to osm from os vector > district, snapping them into existing roads as required where the existing > roads align neatly with os streetview. It would only do this if there were > no ways close by on either side. > > Complex situations will be left to humans. Humans could also sometimes > prepare an area for analysis by the bot, splitting ways as appropriate, > adjusting alignment of existing roads and dealing in advance with situations > we know the bot will have difficulties with. > > Edits would be made as individual changesets, referenced to the mapper > operating of the bot. Each edit would be 'signed off' by the mapper who > would be able to see the proposed changes visual prior to accepting them. > > I'd be happy to review a few of these edits for Gwynedd, I've no objection if it works. On another ITO-analysis note, Peter you are driving me slightly potty because new road "errors" keep popping up. I presume this is because of new OS data? Just when I thought I had all of Southwark bar the north east ear sorted, another six errors pop up. Grr. Tom -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
