On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Graham Stewart wrote: > I think everyone agrees that the OSM Analysis Summary ( > http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ) is extremely > useful for gauging our efforts and highlighting areas that need work - > even if there is clearly some disagreement about how we then use the OS > data on the map. > > I was just idly wondering if we could also use a similar comparison to > indicate the number of roads listed in OS Locator that apparently have > NO corresponding way drawn in OSM?
I am pretty sure it already does that. See "Back Crossflats Place" at http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/map_browser?bbox=428720.776042,430663.227344,429071.990104,430878.696094&layers=os_locator&base_style=white,%20aa_2&clear_map_history=true&referrer=area regards, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
