In this area Bing is a few metres out of alignment with features traced from historic maps and town plans. Yahoo imagery lower res seemed to fit better. A way to drag base layer like in JOSM. Or can it be corrected at source?
phone: +441316502973 talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to talk-gb@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-gb-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-GB digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Release of address data. (Andy Berry) 2. Re: OS OpenData and ODbL OK (Richard Fairhurst) 3. Re: Release of address data. (Ed Loach) 4. Re: Maxspeed conundrum (Peter Miller) 5. Re: OS OpenData and ODbL OK (Robert Whittaker (OSM))_____________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:55:48 +0100 From: Andy Berry <andynbe...@gmail.com> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Release of address data. Message-ID: <canvu1c_pxy0jcg7qqego2m64b9va9orqkhhjgitg_h7zdib...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Release of address data may be on the cards. See www.nlpg.org.UK/Ezine.html. This may help with the release of the Nsg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20110729/f3f5f68c/attachment-0001.html>;_____________________________________________ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:09:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK Message-ID: <1311941389705-6633300.p...@n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Steve Coast wrote: > Hi Robert > Was this resolved with (I believe) Henk's email? Robert and Steve - has there been any progress on this yet? Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OS-OpenData-and-ODbL-OK-tp6545997p6633300.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com._____________________________________________ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:37:25 +0100 From: "Ed Loach" <e...@loach.me.uk> To: "'Andy Berry'" <andynbe...@gmail.com>, <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Release of address data. Message-ID: <05fc01cc4dec$4705e110$d511a330$@loach.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" http://www.nlpg.org.uk/nlpg/eZine.htm (works in latest Firefox and IE but not in Opera, at least here). Ed From: Andy Berry [mailto:andynbe...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 12:56 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Release of address data. Release of address data may be on the cards. See www.nlpg.org.UK/Ezine.html. This may help with the release of the Nsg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20110729/7e6c74ec/attachment-0001.html>;_____________________________________________ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:11:46 +0100 From: Peter Miller <peter.mil...@itoworld.com> To: Kev js1982 <o...@kevswindells.eu> Cc: Talk GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Maxspeed conundrum Message-ID: <CAMdtf+j0ddh4b89DZN-RpM6mNV=vkxjfybwb2xpwurwp9wi...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I suggest that any 'temporary' speed limit change that will last more than 6 months could reasonably be tagged in maxspeed. Shorter periods should probably use a maxspeed:temporary or some other suitable overriding tag? Fyi, I have used 'proposed:maxspeed' to hold the intended new value where signals are being introduced. 'construction:maxspeed' would I guess be appropriate where work has started. I have also used construction:lanes for sections of the M25 where the number of lanes is changing from 3 to 4. Also construction:oneway=no for a section of the A11 which will become a 2-way road when the A11 dualling is complete. Here are some examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4546874 (proposed:maxspeed) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/26295971 (construction:lanes) If we go with the above speed limit tagging then it might be worth updating the ITO speed limit view to show temporary and planned changes to speed limits. Regards, Peter On 29 July 2011 10:27, Kev js1982 <o...@kevswindells.eu> wrote: > on the a46 dualling I have been putting the reduced limits in, but here the > road is on a new alignment so its for the rest of the life of the road > (until is becomes part of ncn route 48 anyway!) . > > Shame there's no way AFAIK of tagging fixme:2013-05-01=roadworks due to > finish, resurvey alignment/maxspeed > and then have openstreet bugs ignore until that date (unless you wish to > see them)! > > On 29 Jul 2011 10:13, "Brian Prangle" <bpran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The M1 between junctions 11 and 13 is a standard 70 mph NSL, but until > spring 2013 it is a 50mph average speed camera regulated section during > upgrade works. After Spring 2013 it will become maxspeed=signals. How to > tag it? My preference would be for the 50mph average speed with a note that > it ends spring 2013. My guess is that sections rolling from the South will > transform from 50 mph to maxspeed=signals, so those of you who travel this > section of the M1 should watch out for the big switch on and edit > appropriately - it will certainly make life swifter than the current > congestion. > > As a general point do routing and travel planner algorithms make use of > these long term construction speed restrictions? > > Regards > > Brian > >_____________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > >_____________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > -------------- next part > -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20110729/8e88f24d/attachment-0001.html>;_____________________________________________ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:21:06 +0100 From: "Robert Whittaker (OSM)" <robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> To: talk-gb <Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK Message-ID: <cacavfkvynfrlgb9tqqw7uukyglbuzofb1fzmhcy4h-kgdd-...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 29 July 2011 13:09, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > Steve Coast wrote: >> Hi Robert >> Was this resolved with (I believe) Henk's email? > > Robert and Steve - has there been any progress on this yet? Not that I'm aware of. As far as I know, OSMF have yet to say anything officially about LWG's statements regarding the CTs. I replied to "Henk's email" the day after he sent it (21st July) explaining that I still need an official statement from OSMF. I also responded (off-list) to the message from Steve that you quoted (26th July) saying the same thing. Unfortunately, I haven't had a reply or acknowledgement to either of those emails that I sent, so I know about as much as you do as to what's going on. :-( Robert. -- Robert Whittaker_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb End of Talk-GB Digest, Vol 58, Issue 24 ***************************************
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
