Isn't it better to say access=private, and possibly foot=no That way people know its private, keep out and its in both map reader and landowners interest for the path to be on the map.
-----Original Message----- From: Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 August 2011 16:39 To: Phil Endecott Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] To delete or not to delete, that is the question... It is precisely because of the possibility of incidents like this, but where the landowner is right, that I really don't want paths like Nick's in the OSM data. Surely the only thing you do not want is the 'designation=public_footpath' tag? - it is good to have the path in the database if it exists, because it is useful for navigation. I prefer to render all paths and tracks, even if I am not supposed to walk on them because they are useful reference marks. Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
