On 15 January 2012 10:27, David Dixon <da...@ddixon.force9.co.uk> wrote:
> > I'm not the user who recently finished off the Weardale Way (and I don't > know whether that was done from survey) but surveying the Way has been one > of my projects. The route between Frosterley and Wolsingham used to be a > low level route running close to the railway (the way you've just walked), > but was subsequently changed to a more interesting higher level route (the > one that's part of the complete OSM relation). The signs you saw have > almost certainly been superseded, but perhaps could be mapped as a separate > "Old Weardale Way" or alternative route relation? > > A change of route would be consistent with what I have seen on the ground - if I have followed the old route in places, it could account for why it is so badly signed! I think having a 'Weardale Way Alternate Route' relation is probably the best approach, otherwise you get a bit of a mess with all the little bits of route that do not appear to go anywhere. I will email the others who have contributed to the route to see what they know about the alternative bits. Cheers Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
