Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > I wonder if another prioritisation approach might be useful > too -- prioritising certain high-value types of objects, > where-ever they might be.
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea. Obviously, everyone has their own definition of "high value" (I'm quite anxious to make sure the NCN survives in good shape, for example), but motorways, A and B roads should certainly be a principal focus. I've been doing a bunch of work on the A55 in North Wales and have noticed others working on A roads around the place. > You can sort of look for these types of object using BadMap [1] at > low zooms, but it's not that easy, and the low zooms aren't > updated as often I don't think. It would be much easier if there > was a specific list of objects to work from. I'm afraid I don't > have the hardware / experience / technical expertise to > generate the data sets, but maybe someone who does might > think it's a good idea... That sort of heavy data lifting is a bit outside my comfort zone as well, I'm afraid, but I wonder if maybe asking Simon just to increase the highway weights at small scales might make them easier to spot... cheers Richard who is currently mapping a country walk (fresh territory) from this afternoon because it shouldn't _all_ be about armchair remapping ;) -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Licence-change-one-month-to-go-tp5531132p5534365.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb