> Michael Collinson wrote: > > On 19/03/2012 13:40, John Sturdy wrote: > > > I think the time's getting close enough that I'll resume that work > > > anyway. > > This is almost certainly a person I had an amicable phone > > conversation with a week last Monday who is still concerned > > that OS open data somehow is not compatible with the > > new terms. Probability is dropping like a stone given the time > > that has passed but there is still a chance of a yes. > > AIUI only a small amount of Andy Street's work (I don't see the point of > pussyfooting around, we all know who it is!) is OS-derived. And, with the > best will in the world, any monkey like thee or me can trace from OS > OpenData, but Andy's footpath surveying work is excellent and it would be a > shame to lose it because of an unrelated issue. > > Would a sensible solution be for LWG and/or any other volunteers to work > with him on identifying the affected changesets; for those changesets to be > retained; and for the remainder to remain 'declined' and be dropped in early > April?
Here's my manual check (taking me about 2 hours) of Andy Streets changes. Everything before 01/04/2010 has been assumed ok, which is around 1100 changesets. Everything after this change has been considered: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4281583 This is about 900 changesets. I've grouped these into a few different categories for which could be considered to have OS 'issues' - amounting to around 37 changesets: // OS Derived changesets // Changesets with OS named in changeset comment: // OS StreetView http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4415489 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4415876 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4416305 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595934 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595929 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595853 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7312608 // OS Locator http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7303315 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7367792 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7362036 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7321053 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7512624 // OS OpenData Locator+Streetview http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7286972 // SDNP (South Downs National Park) Import // OS_OpenData_Strategi (except western edge) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216155 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216120 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216047 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215988 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215902 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215608 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215522 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215395 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215211 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216603 // // Named in source:name tag // // OS StreetView http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8323516 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7550902 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7499950 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7460982 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7314486 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6780651 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5844267 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5306397 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5251524 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4537078 // OS Locator http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7436665 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7362367 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5353674 /// End I'm not sure which one's he's concerned about (I have now asked him explicitly too). I don't see any Code-Point data used, so there should be no worry there.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb