Jason Cunningham wrote: > Last nights check showed almost the entire route has gone!
:( > Disturbingly I've been mapping around > Brixham for the last six months and I'm therefore concerned I may > have done the dirty deed. No, you didn't. It appears to have been deleted by user Sailor Steve (http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318/1747) in changeset 10773722. Possibly the age-old "too easy to delete large relations in JOSM" issue. I guess it makes a change from the National Byway and poor old NCN 4 which are the usual fallguys... If there's anyone here who's confident in wangling .osm files (not really my thing) and can reinstate the old version, please do. > For other routes your able to access a history, but when I seek the > history of the 'Southwest Coast Path' things just hang and eventually > result in an error message. Some big relations are just too big to show the whole history without boggling the server, but you can always look at the raw XML: http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318 Then check the version attribute, and page back like this: http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318/1750 http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318/1749 http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318/1748 etc. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Southwest-Coast-Path-relation-has-mostly-disappeared-tp5620160p5620205.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
