On 2 July 2012 16:19, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote:
> Peter Miller wrote: > > I started using railway:historic=xxx in place of railway=dismantled > > for cycletracks etc in response to a comment through OSM > > messaging that one editor had found it confusing to suddenly > > have cyclepaths being rendered as railways in Potlatch due the > > railway=xxx tag (although that is not a good reason to make > > the change in itself.) > > Indeed not. That's a 30-second change to P2 to change the rendering order. > Put a trac ticket in and someone will change the stylesheet! > Good. It is now on trac. Thanks Shaun. > > As for the best venue to discuss tagging, I signed off the main talk a > > long time ago as it took far too much time to keep up with. > > I now use the wiki as my main place for global tagging discussions. > > There is a tagging@ list now, of course. > However... that email list is very busy and currently full of discussions about mapping 'larger mini-roundabouts' and eclectic other topics. I am glad people are using it, but the wiki is also a productive place to discuss tagging and is a lot more focused. For railways the 'talk:Railways' page is pretty good. Personally I won't be signing up the talk-tagging but will keep an eye on it from time to time. Re Potlatch: thanks for sorting out the rendering Richard! Regards, Peter > > cheers > Richard > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/railway-historic-rail-tags-tp5714652p5714762.html > Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb