I've downloaded the some of the data sets and fired up qgis.
So, yes the Natural England datasets are a better resolution for National Parks. Be Seeing You - Rob. If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't for you. ---------------------------------------- > From: e...@loach.me.uk > To: rw_nor...@hotmail.com; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Request: Norfolk Broads National Park Boundary > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 07:50:33 +0000 > > I've not looked at OS Strategi, but the Natural England datasets are > now OGL licenced and they contain the national park boundaries, and > I think are better resolution. > > http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/data/default.aspx > > Ed > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Norris [mailto:rw_nor...@hotmail.com] > > Sent: 02 November 2012 23:50 > > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: [Talk-GB] Request: Norfolk Broads National Park Boundary > > > > > > > > I believe that currently a boundary way or relation for the > National > > Park of the Norfolk Broads is missing from OSM. > > > > I was wondering if any one in the East Anglia area would be up to > the > > challenge of creating it? > > > > I assume the best way of creating a tentative out-line would be a > > manual conversion or trace from the OS Strategi product, similar > to > > how the South Downs National Park area was mapped. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_ > > National_Parks > > > > Sounds ideal for something to do on these long winter nights... > > > > Be Seeing You - Rob. > > If at first you don't succeed, > > then skydiving isn't for you. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
