One in London has had disused: put in front of the tags http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1528661184
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Bogus Zaba <bog...@bogzab.plus.com> wrote: > Has anybody else noticed / been annoyed by the way that disused railway > stations are rendered just like regular railway stations on the cycle map, > transport map and MapQuest open views of OSM? > > Mapnik seems to know the difference and renders the disused stations with > a smaller symbol and grey label, but viewing the other three layers leads > you to the conclusion that these are all regular stations. > > For an example see this (http://www.openstreetmap.org/** > ?lat=53.43943&lon=-2.96918&**zoom=15&layers=C<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.43943&lon=-2.96918&zoom=15&layers=C>) > in North Liverpool where I was cycling using the cycle map recently. Bank > Hall and Kirkdale are regular stations which are both useful landmarks for > a cyclist and offer a potential ride home whereas Spellow and Walton & > Anfield do not exist. > > I understand that there are enthusiasts out there who are interested in > historic maps, but the features which are important for that type of > mapping can just get in the way of useful everyday find-your-way-around > maps. > > Anybody know where should this be reported as a rendering bug? > > Thanks > > Bogus Zaba > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gb<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb