Chris Hill wrote:
How did the mapper get this info? What licence is it under? FoI for
example is copyright and so still needs to be released under a
suitable licence. AFAIK local authorities are responsible for naming
roads not the DfT.
(from OSM messages from the original mapper following my list post) I
believe that the main evidence is this:
http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/managing-our-roads/private-finance-initiatives-design-build-finance-and-operate-dbfo/a50a564-stoke-to-derby-link-design-build-finance-and-operate-dbfo-contract/
I'm not convinced on a couple of counts - on that page it definitely
reads like a description rather than a name (it's describing which
sections of a road opened when).
Re licensing,
http://www.highways.gov.uk/terms-and-conditions/
says
"You may use and re-use the information featured on this website
(not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under
the terms of the Open Government Licence.", which links to:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/
Along with Roger Calvert, I'd say that "Foston Hatton Hilton Bypass"
sounds like a description rather than a name.
Cheers,
andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb