Great however the OSM referenced has been shoehorned in there (not complaining though), as the cartographers mentioned finding the new 2000ft "mountain" just seemed to use Ordinance Survey....notably the wrong height appears on OSM and not updated. :(
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.81021&lon=-2.60709&zoom=16&layers=M -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Re-the-brilliant-and-constantly-improving-Wikipedia-of-maps-tp5759027p5759062.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
