Routers cannot be expected to know the intricacies of every countrys spotted 
limit legislation, it would therefore be wrong to remove the default 
car/motorcycle speed limits.

Vehicles to which other limits apply are usually driven by professionals and 
should therefore be using specialist tools, which do take onto account the type 
of vehicle.

Routers in my opinion, over use road classification and seen to assume that 
trunk is some sort of expressway, which in most cases they aren't. Primaries, B 
roads and tertiarys, many of which are declassified trunk are just as quick, 
often quicker as they take a shorter route.

Phil (trigpoint)
--

Sent from my Nokia N9



On 26/09/2013 12:37 Jason Cunningham wrote:

The subject of UK speed limits and problems of mapping them has come up a 
couple of times on these lists.


Firstly we have a problem because many users want a single numerical value in 
the maxspeed tag, despite UK legislation having a range of speed limits for 
road dependent on the physical nature of the road. Secondly our Speed Limit 
legislation is an utter mess, with poor simplified guidance that confuses 
people. I suppose you can argue that our problems with tagging speed limits is 
appropriate because it mirrors the mess that is our speed limit legislation.


Last year, when I was a bit more active in OSM, I wrote up all my notes on 
Speed Limits on my OSM wiki page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jamicu/UK_Speed_Limits
Worth reading because a few posts before show some people are making perfectly 
understandable but incorrect conclusions about speed limits

eg 1

On 21 September 2013 22:09, Andy Street <m...@andystreet.me.uk> wrote:

I'm also not a huge
fan of the current practice of placing "single" or "dual" in the
maxspeed:type tag either as I consider the number of carriageways to be
feature of the road rather than the speed limit.

Regards,

Andy Street



Single or Dual refer to two of our three national speed limit types. NSL speed 
limits are created by the physical nature of the road and not signs. Dual & 
Single are definitely a "feature" of the speed limit.


eg 2

On 23 September 2013 09:34, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote:

National speed limits rarely apply in built up areas, other than
sometimes on faster feeder roads. The built up area limit in the UK is
30mph, unless signposted differently. This is implied by the presence of
street lighting. 30mph limits, where there are no streetlights, require
repeater signs.

Phil (trigpoint}



National speed limits nearly always apply in built up areas. The 30mph 'built 
up area limit' you refer to is the third type of NSL, the NSL Restricted road 
type. Along side the other two NSL's it is created by the physical nature of 
the road and not signs.


But getting to the main point, the use of maxspeed:type=national


I strongly disagree with removing data which tells us the type of speed limit 
and replacing it with a word that implies 1 of 3 types of speed limit is in 
place. It's useful information and more importantly it's the correct 
information. I'm not sure if this is actually the case here though?


Peter, you argue that your mapping what's on the sign? But the signs do not 
create the speed limit for a NSL road, its the physical  features of the road 
that create the NSL type. That means 'System of Street Lighting', 'oncoming 
traffic separated by barrier', but if neither of the previous applies the road 
is 'single carriageway NSL'


Personally, I think having two tags is bad practice, and that we should remove 
the numerical value from the maxspeed tag and replace it with the correct speed 
limit type. End users should then use a table to get the speed limit for the 
vehicle they're interested in.


I accept its a complex subject and I accept average users of OSM will find it 
easier to simply type in the maxspeed for cars, but the more confident users of 
OSM should be seeking to improve data, and not strip it out. Having access to 
NSL types is very useful especially when we hear about plans to change speed 
limits.

Jason


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to