On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2014, at 09:52, Ed Loach <edlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tom wrote:
> >
> >> In many other areas of inner London, particularly residential (e.g.
> >> http://binged.it/1iByiPy), the typologies and shapes are pretty
> >> easy to understand from aerial imagery so you can accurately guess
> >> individual buildings.
> >
> > Perhaps it is just me, but I don’t think residential buildings
> > without addresses are worth adding to OSM, and you can’t get
> > addresses without a survey (or spot the odd business that may be
> > hidden amongst them).
I agree.
>
> I’d be quite happy for someone to trace buildings, and all I had to do
> was update the house numbers, as the buildings are so hard to draw
> when on the ground. I often use Vespucci for editing on the ground,
> thus don’t need to spend ages once I get home editing.
I usually trace them before I go out. But I will only trace them if I
have an active plan of checking them out (and their addresses).
cheers,
Derick
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb