On 22/08/14 15:23, Brian Prangle wrote:
I'll leave it to others to judge whether this is data they would want on
the map, but:
Thankful_Village= yes_WWI
Thankful_Village= double_WWI&II
I believe that
Thankful_Village=WWI
Thankful_Village=WWI;WWII
would be more in the spirit of the tagging system. Alternatively, to
avoid multiple values:
Thankful_Village:WWI=yes
Thankful_Village:WWII=yes
wikipedia= en:Thankful_Villages
I think this is a misuse of wikipedia tags. The tag should be to an
entry for the specific village (regardless of its thankful status). I
also think it is wrong for the Thankful_Village article to repeat the
contents of the corresponding category.
wikidata=Q3519572
Not sure how to interpret this, but I think that this should also follow
the indirection chain via the wikipedia article for the village.
NB Wikipedia should never be used as a primary source for OSM as:
- it is supposed to be a secondary source, so you should always cite the
corresponding primary source;
- it has much less strict rules on database copyrights, so you may end
up making an illegal database import.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
