Block paving is very common for residential streets in the Netherlands, so that's not really enough to distinguish a living_street.
I'd keep highway=living_street for (at minimum) single surface, no clear distinction between where cars and pedestrians go, and no clear straight route for cars. On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > By coincidence, I've just got home from mapping a "home zone" > signposted area - first time I've seen one. I'm tagging it as > living_street. Here it is: > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4004201> > > I would say do not use the tag just because of seeing block paving on > the street. As far as I'm aware, there's no rule that motorists have > any obligation to interpret block paving in a particular way. In > practice, I guess it does influence them, but as a "nudge" not a rule, > so it seems to me that "highway=residential and surface=paving_stones" > (as you suggest, Rob) is a good fit for the merely block-paved. > > Best > Dan > > 2014-08-31 19:56 GMT+01:00 Amaroussi-OSM <kurias...@gmail.com>: > > As far as I know for minor roads, I always default to using unclassified > or residential (depending on the surrounding area’s predominant land use). > I only use “Pedestrian” where such sign exists, and “Living streets” for > actual home zones with “home zone” signs, if I ever found one. > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
