On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> I don't see a problem with access=private as this could be handy for > micromapping a property. access=public should probably be access=yes. > The tagging proposal to date imagined only the "shared dump stations" of the type that would (in years past) have appeared on AAA maps. If it's to be used for backyard or per-site hookups, the proposal needs adjustment. ------------------------------------------- Mapping a hookup in someone's backyard offers* the same pitfalls as mapping their home toilet and recycling bin.* The next level of private is "guests only", which I called "destination". *The cases seem to be:* per-site hookup, available only to registered guests at the particular site shared dump station, available only to guests of the destination shared dump station, available for drive up shared dump station, free *Tagged as:* Way/node or As a tagged property of a mapped place (e.g. campground, store, fuel station), without a specific position. As a tagged property of a numbered camp slot (e.g. sites 1-22 offer per-site hookups). A caravan site might have 200 private hookups. We don't want the hookups to be rendered at the same level as the central dump station. Backyard dump stations should render even less prominently, if they are even mapped at all.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb