Hi Dan, On 19 March 2015 at 08:15, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-03-19 1:54 GMT+00:00 Pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: > > > > On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach <edlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> A wiki search for admin_ref finds > >> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Tagging_Road_Numbers > >> > >> > > > > There's a right way to tag road numbers and a wrong way. The above is the > > wrong way. > > Thanks but this is a bit unhelpful - could you explain what you mean > please? > > Dan > > All 'tagging' is doing is effectively naming the database field in which the attribute is being placed. Road numbers all belong in the road number field irrespective of what the number is. If map renderers don't want to use C and U numbered roads, that is up to them to ignore and not for mappers to place in a different field in the database. Doesn't that seem a more logical approach to the issue ? -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
