yes I had in mind to do that. So here we go. Belgium filtered edit tracker:
http://harrywood.dev.openstreetmap.org/diffreader/schools/?filter=belgium


Unfortunately Belgium has a messier bounding box ( lon>2.516 AND lon<6.449 AND 
lat>49.482 AND lat<51.516 ) It includes some bits of France and most of 
Luxembourg, but I'm sure they're used to it.

Harry
________________________________
From: Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com>
To: Harry Wood <m...@harrywood.co.uk> 
Cc: Talk-gb OSM List <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, 18 January 2016, 10:36
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project : Schools - New edit tracker tool



Thanks from me too Harry. It would be a nice gesture to include a filter for 
Belgium as they've just started a schools QP. Like Rob I'm amazed at how this 
QP has taken off compared to previous efforts

Regards

Brian



On 17 January 2016 at 20:35, Harry Wood <m...@harrywood.co.uk> wrote:

I made a new tracker tool for this school mapping project:
>
>http://harrywood.dev.openstreetmap.org/diffreader/schools
>
>
>So have fun with that! This gives us a user ranking of who's been making most 
>edits to schools, counting by objects rather than by changesets. If you edit 
>10 schools in a single changeset you score 10 edits. So that's better but...
>
>Obviously this might "mis-count" in other ways. Minor tweaks will count the 
>same as careful detailed mapping. Repeated tweaks split into different 
>changesets will score one per changeset. The biggest problem is that careful 
>detailed mapping of buildings and other features inside a school area, which 
>we'd definitely like to encourage, won't get counted at all unless you touch 
>the school area.
>
>You may recognise it as a re-purposing of the Wimbledon tennis edit tracker 
>and the Big Baseball Project edit tracker. I've made it filter out only school 
>edits within a UK & Ireland bounding box (which was a surprisingly difficult 
>extension to the code, since diff files don't necessarily have any coordinates 
>for a modified way) I set the tool to crunch the numbers starting from 1st Jan.
>
>
>One thing I said during the baseball project, was that user rankings are all 
>good fun, but the most important number is the number of users we've managed 
>to get involved in the project! (highlighted in yellow) But maybe I'm just 
>saying that because I need to work on my own ranking :-)
>
>Harry
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-GB mailing list
>Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to