Andy
That's a very good point. I suspect that I mis-remembered the use of
crossing_ref=* (used with highway=crossing + crossing=*) as just "ref".
brand=legible_london seems a much better fit, particularly as it makes it seem
less of an assertion about the actual legibility of the map (as noted in an
earlier comment).
Perhaps also operator=* for the borough responsible, or TfL as appropriate?
-- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell)
-------- Original message --------
From: Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com>
Date: 10/01/2017 15:10 (GMT+00:00)
To: Robert Skedgell <r...@hubris.org.uk>
Cc: Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions
On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell <r...@hubris.org.uk> wrote:
> ref=legible_london
I would only use the ref= tag if there is a reference code for each
installation, e.g. if the totem has a displayed reference like "A01"
designed for users to see. From the pictures I don't think that they
do, and if they did, I would expect it to be a reference for internal
use - i.e. official_ref=
Think of it like bus stops (ref=C) or road numbers (ref=A204). Would
it make sense if I was to render a map with an icon for the
information point, with the reference shown underneath?
I would suggest brand=legible_london as an alternative, but there
might be other options too.
Thanks,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
