> Can anyone assist with a query for a new user. Sounds like *access=customers* is the way forward here. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Regards, *Paul* On 10 July 2018 at 21:35, Simon Wetton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > Can anyone assist with a query for a new user. > > I want to allow limited access for a set of roads. It is a private estate > with permission access for certain users but not general access for all but > it does require navigation permission so it will allow a navigation app > ability to plot a route and Ellie access. There is paid entry or free entry > based upon your status but I don’t know how to tag the access -can you > advise? > > Kind regards > > Simon Wetton > > > > M : 07774 960970 > > > > *Confidentiality Note:THIS E-MAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND > ARE INTENDED ONLY FOR THE RECIPIENT TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY BE > PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT PRIVILEGE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, BE > AWARE THAT ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, MODIFICATION OR USE OF > THIS E-MAIL OR ANY ATTACHMENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED > THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY BY RETURN E-MAIL > AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR COMPUTER AND SYSTEM. ROUNDSHAW FARM > DISCLAIMS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FROM AND ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FOR > THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON ACTING OR REFRAINING FROM > ACTING, ON ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE.* > > > On 10 Jul 2018, at 21:10, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2018-07-10 12:30 PM, Mark Goodge wrote: > > > I think it's a positive. One of the biggest issues with large-scale use of > OSM is that OSM's own tile server isn't suited for high-volume use, but > most of the alternative tile servers are rate-limited and require payment > for larger volumes. If ESRI's tile server will, as the blog post suggests, > be free to access, then it will be a more useful alternative for users who > don't have the resources to host their own tile server. > > > It's not the same as OpenStreetMap Carto. OpenStreetMap Carto is written > in CartoCSS and rendered server-side, what they have uses client-side > rendering and lots of ESRI technology. > > I think a more granular update schedule is unlikely to be an issue for > most users. Even "every few weeks" is going to be a lot better than Bing > and Google. > > > Yes, every few weeks is more than fast enough for most uses. osm.org is > different because it's part of the feedback cycle, so minutely updates > matter. Quarterly updates are common with many maps. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
