Hi,
I'm presently targeting low use, inappropriate and non rendering values
of landuse.
Presently looking at landuse=scrub .. as a human use of the land I don't
think scrub is one.
It is a land cover and would be better tagged as natural=scrub, it makes
sense and it renders!
While doing this I can across this Way: 250644200 tagged as landuse=wood
.. from 2013.
It is adjacent to Way: 250644211 tagged landuse=scrub.
This area should all be tagged natural=scrub .. no trees evident in
current imagery.
Are that any disagreement with;
* landuse=scrub is better tagged as natural=scrub?
* landuse=wood is better tagged as natural=wood?
* that this particular area is better updated using the present imagery?
Note that a past edit was 'repaired' by woodpeck_repair in 2015 on the
Way: 250644200.
Personally I see these as global issues rather than local issues. But
there you go.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
