No that's the effect of us (correctly) anonymising the order of points
in private and public traces.
Potlatch has been fixed to handle it but JOSM hasn't (yet).
See previous talk thread for more.
Tom
On 14/11/2018 17:33, Paul Berry wrote:
It could be obfuscated Strava logs or something like that. Would explain
the deliberate lack of timestamps and a high use of footpaths/towpaths
(for those out running) rather than roads.
Regards,
/Paul/
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:11, Silent Spike <silentspike...@gmail.com
<mailto:silentspike...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm editing this area
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/57.17591/-2.12320) in JOSM
and the GPS data in the area contains some traces uploaded which
look like spam (loads of horizontal lines which seem to form the
shape of the river and other features).
I'm unsure of the extent of the data, but it looks as though they
are all marked as recorded from 01/01/70 01:00 - 01:00.
Is there somewhere to report this so that they can be removed? I had
a look around the wiki and found the data working group, but it's
not clear whether they deal with GPS traces and I couldn't find
anywhere that specifically discusses them except a figure caption on
the page for vandalism.
Here's a screenshot from JOSM
<https://i.imgur.com/JjRd7Zz.jpg> since private traces aren't
visible on the website
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
