I've dropped DWG a note because the mapper in question has just responded and I need to hold my tongue rather than reply.
Thanks for the tip. Regards, *Paul* On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 20:57, ajt1...@gmail.com <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14/11/2018 19:48, Paul Berry wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Not for the first time I'm having a run-in with a user regarding > > arbitrary mapping of road classifications in Leeds. Latest changeset > > comments: http://osm.org/changeset/64361310 > > In this particular case I'd drop a mail to the DWG at > d...@osmfoundation.org as they're not unfamiliar with this mapper. > > > > > Does anyone have previous experience of nipping this kind of thing in > > the bud? > > Lots of locals saying "no, that's wrong - X is not a Y, it is a Z, which > is how it was mapped before" is a good place to start. There are > exceptions to "A road is primary" etc. in the UK (e.g. Oxford High > Street among others), but they are fairly rare. > > > > > I don't mind manually reverting changes at some point but I'd rather > > not do that just to start/prolong what might be an edit war. > > Once there's a a concensus of local mappers it's not so much an edit war > as one person who doesn't agree with everyone else. > > I'd also suggest a review by locals of their changes in MK too (and > sadly for me I'm probably more familiar with the centre of MK than the > centre of Leeds these days). > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > (from the DWG, although I wasn't directly involved in issues involving > this mapper previously) > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
