Hi Andrzej,

I feel a bit conflicted here. Having the choice of several tags does make things easier when adding complicated addresses, but for less experienced mappers it does also help if things are kept simple. For example, if better guidance regarding UK address mapping was added to the wiki, it would definitely be clearer to recommend one main tag for places below city.

I've noticed that iD varies the address fields shown depending on which country is being edited. Some countries have a field labelled 'Suburb', while for the UK the only level above street is 'City'. It would definitely improve things if another field could be added, but it would be difficult to argue for adding several fields. Therefore, it would probably be better to agree on one main locality tag. Whatever happens tags such as addr:suburb and addr:village are already in use and will most probably continue to be used.

Cheers,
Will

On 30/01/2019 22:24, Andrzej wrote:
Thank you for the discussion so far. I've been thinking about a solution for tagging localities that would work for both mappers who want to tag locality types and those who don't. Current proposals (addr:town|village and addr:locality|sublocality) are two distinct and incompatible tagging schemes so reaching a consensus may be impossible.

How about tagging localities as addr:locality|sublocality _and_ addr:locality|sublocality:type=city|town|suburb|village|hamlet|campus, so they can be added separately and at different times?

Best regards,
Andrzej

On 28 January 2019 04:40:26 GMT+08:00, Andrzej <nd...@redhazel.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi,

    When working on post codes in East Anglia I realised the current
    address tagging scheme is insufficient for even fairly basic
    scenarios. I have already discussed the issues with some of the
    most experienced mappers and like to bring these issues to your
    attention. Robert has summarised his ideas in
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/UK_Address_Mapping

    The bottom line is, I would like to be tag commonly used addresses
    without losing information and without resorting to addr:full.

    Issues:
    1. Post towns (most pressing one because there is a lot of
    confusion around it). The UK is fairly unique in that not every
    town is a post town. This makes it impossible to tag e.g. Station
    Road, Histon, Cambridge CB24 9LF.
    Wiki recommends addr:city to be used for tagging post towns
    (Cambridge) but then how do we tag Histon?
    - Robert recommends sticking to the current meaning of addr:city
    and using addr:town and addr:village for town and village names,
    which, although not in wiki, are already being used in the UK. I
    like this solution because it is very explicit in what each addr:
    key means and it doesn't redefine addr:city.
    - SK53 prefers using addr:city for everything (towns, even
    villages) and either not tagging post towns (they can be seen as a
    an internal detail of a closed Royal Mail database) or using a new
    tag for it, like addr:post_town. It is a simple solution, results
    in Histon being called Histon and not Cambridge (without
    introducing new tags for town and village names) and is commonly
    used. It is also a bit confusing (what exactly is a city?) and I
    think we we should at least support tagging post towns.

    Key questions:
    a) addr:city for post towns or towns and villages?
    b) how to rag remaining information (respectively, towns and
    villages or post towns,)

    2. Tagging addresses within campuses, business parks etc. There is
    addr:place but it is supposed to be used instead of addr:street.
    Again, Robert has a fairly decent proposal for that using
    addr:place or addr:locality and addr:parentstreet. Please comment.

    2a. should buildings in campuses be tagged with
    addr:buildingnumber/name or addr:unit? I would prefer
    buildingname/number (as they are often subdivided) but these seem
    to be associated with addr:street.

    3. Similar to (2) but for buildings. Tagging buildings that have
    e.g. a single name but multiple house numbers?

    Best regards,
    ndrw6


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to