> Just a quick comment. Parts of the Maxar imagery seem to have significant offsets.
I have noticed that too. The geometry is often wonky with incorrect angles. I'm not sure how that's possible, but comparison with something like Esri reveals it. At the moment I'm using it more for confirming details that aren't present on older imagery rather than trying to get precise geometry from it. On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 8:24 PM ael <witwa...@disroot.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Borbus wrote: > > looks like the new Maxar imagery is quite recent in that area and, > > Just a quick comment. Parts of the Maxar imagery seem to have significant > offsets. At least I have noticed that it often does not match my > (fairly accurate) gps tracks. And its offsets don't match those for > Maxbox. I think it is marked "beta" presumably in case of these sorts > of problem. > > ael > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
