Tagging it as type=memorial and memorial=yes doesn't seem very useful to me.
Even though the wiki doesn't say you can use historic=memorial on a relation, I would tag it as that. It would be similar to this one nearby [1], would still get rendered and be recognised by data consumers. Or failing that, just add it as a node.
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7838824 On 03/09/2019 11:40, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've just added the RNLI Dunkirk Memorial at Margate to the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9995162 but I wasn't sure how to best tag the relation, and the three connected ways that comprise it. It's an area of white-painted conrete, in the shape of an anchor. Any suggestions for improvement?
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
