I think all 3 tags should be the  standard.

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 11:45, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for a bot edit
>
> are you suggesting to just add crossing_ref=zebra, or to convert
> crossing=zebra into highway=crossing + crossing=uncontrolled too?
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:23 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 24 Oct 2019, 22:48 by rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *Before I start this message, I would like to say that I am looking for
>> solutions and not wishing to open the flood gates on abuse of the iD
>> editors. On the whole they do a great job and even when we disagree it
>> should be with respect. Right now on to the message itself:*
>>
>>
>> It seems like the iD editor's "upgrade this" feature is replacing
>> crossing=zebra with crossing=marked but NOT adding crossing_ref=zebra to
>> the node. If lots of users make use of this "feature" in the UK then we
>> stand to lose some valuable data. Taginfo UK says there are 4,710
>> crossing=zebra features in the UK.
>>
>> I have added a comment on to the GitHub issue but no reply yet.
>> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6962
>>
>> I would suggest opening a new issue request GB specific - maybe with
>> something like
>> "I checked sample of 100 crossing tagged this way, error rate is low".
>>
>> Comments in a closed issue are likely to be lost/unnoticed.
>>
>> Though with just 5k crossing it seems that bot edit would be preferable if
>> - error rate is considered low
>> - crossing_ref tagging is acceptable
>> - there is no realistic plan to fight with iD over deprecating
>> crossing=zebra
>> - bot edits are considered as acceptable
>>
>> Why bot edit is preferable?
>> - cooperation with iD developers is not necessary
>> - more people can do it (I may do it in case of a clear support)
>> - adding complex region-based handling for 5k objects is making
>> maintenance of editor
>> complex, it is likely to not be done by iD developers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to