I sense this is a good idea someone is sure to have had before and nixed - or else it's not a good idea at all.
Is there any reason why OSM can't set up a user co-op (for instance) that would offer a paid tileserver service? On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 15:58, Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 03/12/2019 15:48, Tom Hughes wrote: > > The reason they're getting that error is almost certainly that they > > aren't paying and they're either not passing an API key at all or > > they're passing one that is for a different site. > > > > Most likely the site was developed before API keys were required > > and has never been updated, but if they add a key they will almost > > certainly exceed the free allowance and have to pay which is likely > > why they haven't done so. > > They are passing an API key. But it doesn't seem to have billing enabled > on it. Hence it won't be allowed to generate billable API calls. > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
