Good idea - I've added a pull request to Osmose https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/pull/714 - please take a look and weigh in if you think it could be improved.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:47 PM Ken Kilfedder <spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk> wrote: > Is it worth adding this to Osmose and the other QA tools? > > --- > https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain > spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk > > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, at 4:31 PM, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > > Further to this - if you want to look for barrier=kerb + highway=crossing > nodes in your area, which may be disrupting routing, the Overpass query > is node["barrier"="kerb"]["highway"="crossing"] : > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/P5Y > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:20 PM Edward Catmur <ecat...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > Returning to the original issue, I think I've worked out what the problem > is. It's that on a crossing node, kerb=* is fine (it describes the > presence/attributes of the kerb on the subsidiary highway) but barrier=kerb > should *not* be used. > > Combining kerb=* with highway=crossing is blessed by Wiki: > > If the kerb is identical on both sides of a crossing, it is possible to > add the kerb=* tag to the highway > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway>=crossing > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing> node, which > sacrifices accuracy for simplicity, consider using kerb:left and kerb:right > if the kerbs differ. > > > but this doesn't say that barrier=kerb should be included on the crossing > node! > > I think barrier=kerb + highway=crossing should be regarded as a mistake. > Taginfo shows ~ 1000 of them (0.47 of barrier=kerb nodes; 0.03% of > highway=crossing nodes) which should fixable. > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> > wrote: > > On Wednesday, 18 December 2019, David Woolley wrote: > > On 18/12/2019 13:31, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > > > That said, the same goes for cars - other than the lowest bodied > sports > > > cars, pretty much all motor vehicles are capable of taking a kerb at > low > > > speed. > > > > Although raised kerbs are generally there to stop that happening and the > > resultant trespass on the footway can be illegal, e.g. in London. As > > such routers should not be routing motor vehicles over kerbs. > > Its a level of detail that few of us have mapped, but it is perfectly > acceptable, and quite common, to route motor vehicles over lowered kerbs > to access private property. > > Phil (trigpoint) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > -- > Sent from my Sailfish device > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb