Having unexpectedly found myself with a spare hour, I have had a go at
amending NCN 51 in central Milton Keynes.
There are 3 Changesets involved:
#78646743. The main changes. I marked this to be reviewed, but I do hope that
nobody wants it reverted because I got a bit carried away. As part of the edit
I had to correct a one-way road that isn't really one-way, but I then carried
on resolving issues flagged by the iD editor; sorry!
#78651993. Mopping up. After the main edit, I spotted a few ways that I had
not removed from the relation, so removed them here.
#78647795. I have flagged some ways with "fixme". They were part of the old
route, but now form a spur off the main route. I have asked Sustrans whether
they consider the spur to be part of NCN 51 and await their response. I could
tag them with "approach", but I'm not clear whether that would mean that all
>1000 other ways in the relation would then have to be tagged "main ".
Open for comments / suggestions.
Regards, Peter
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
----- Forwarded message ----- From: "Peter Neale" <neal...@yahoo.co.uk> To:
"Talk-gb OSM List" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Cc: Sent: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at
13:54 Subject: Fw: [Talk-GB] Appeal for Help - Amending a Route Relation - NCN
Route 51 Many thanks to @Richard Fairhurst, @Warin and @ Paul Berry for their
encouragement and help. I will have a go at making the amendments using the iD
Editor.
I'm not sure how soon that will happen, though, as I hear that Christmas is
coming and Grandads like me are meant to spend time with their families, not on
the computer.
Before I start, I have one more question:
@Richard Fairhurst said, "It's more important that the route is unambiguous,
i.e. the member ways all join to form a single route without unnecessary
branches and loops."
However, the Sustrans map shows some dead-end branches (presumably to link into
other infrastructure, such as roads and other cyclepaths). There are 2 that
are relevant here; one is marked on the ground (probably because it was part of
the old route), but the other is not. I do not propose to include the unmarked
one, but what about the one that is marked? Should I include it, or not?
Regards,Peter
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
