Hi Martin, Looks and sounds good to me. From what I've seen looking at the data in the past, and again now using your visualisation, both speed bumps and cycle parking look good to import.
Out of interest, I did spot that the original data (from TfLs ground survey with two photos) did look slightly higher quality than the proposed import for speed bumps. I think this is because you snap the speed bump to existing nodes if within a certain distance. This results in a very small drop in data quality in a few places. Can I therefore ask: - Can Richard's code create new nodes on a way or are data items simply dropped if no existing nodes is nearby? - And what tolerance is being applied (i.e. how close is "nearby")? As noted this really is tiny discrepancies with the benefits of the import being far greater than the odd shift of a few metres. Best regards Rob P.s sorry for the non threaded reply. For some reason nabble was throwing an unauthorized error and I don't receive these emails into my inbox.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
