I'm of the view that if it is fundamentally a footway then it should
be tagged as highway=footway. If bicycles are allowed, then add
bicycle=designated.

If the question is here:
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.545389,-0.2770973,3a,75y,234.69h,79.34t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_-EkidXXQeWqPY5KfXGmaQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D_-EkidXXQeWqPY5KfXGmaQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D96.41411%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
then this is just a footpath across a bit of grass that someone has
decided to allow bikes on. Looks like a footway, rides like a footway,
tag like a footway

Stephen


On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 13:48, Dave F via Talk-GB
<talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> There's a misconception that highway=cycleway implies an automatic authority 
> over other path users. This is untrue It's just a hierarchy of the number of 
> different transport modes permitted to use it. Similarly, highway=residential 
> permits motor vehicles as well as bicycles & pedestrians.Who has right of way 
> is specific to certain locations.
>
> If it's definitely designated as cyclable (I couldn't see any signs in GSV) 
> then I'd tag it as
>
> highway=cycleway
> bicycle=designated
> foot=designated
> segregated=no
> surface=asphalt  (in this case)
> width=*
>
> If you know it's a public footpath add:
> designation=public_footpath
>
> If you know the footpath's reference add:
> prow_ref=*
>
> Is there a reason you tagged it as access=no?
>
> The only place a rider of a bicycle should go full speed is in a velodrome.
>
> Cheers
> DaveF
>
> On 21/11/2020 10:28, Edward Bainton wrote:
>
> Is there established tagging for a tarmac path that is ~1.5m wide, but 
> designated foot and cycles shared?
>
> Eg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871919974
>
> There's highway=cycleway | cycleway=shared, but when you're on it it doesn't 
> feel like one, and you can't go full speed. But maybe that's the best tag 
> nonetheless?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to