That really doesn't belong in OSM which is a geographical database of what exists now. Please remove it
If you want to map things that no longer exist you should investigate Open Historical Map. Phil (trigpoint) On 1 September 2025 19:17:25 BST, Daniel Hatton via Talk-GB <[email protected]> wrote: > >I've just tentatively marked a line - way #1426446375 - which is of historical >significance for three reasons: > >- it's a former route of the public right of way whose current route is > on the map as ways #236141514, #1316968262, #499954461, #236141513, > and #499954465 > >- it was the eastern boundary of one of the fields ("Church Field") in > the pre-inclosure strip farming system of the parish where it's > situated > >- it's the route of a Roman road that was widely misidentified in the > 19th century as the Icknield Way (the current consensus is that the > name "Icknield Way" belongs to another Roman road running parallel > with it, about 2.7km further east) > >I've looked both on the ground and in satellite imagery, and there's no >obvious trace of the line currently at surface. > >What's people's view on whether this line should be marked in OSM, and if so, >what tags it should have? > >-- > >Kind regards, > >Dan Hatton > > Dr. Daniel C. Hatton > >E-mail: [email protected] > >Signal: dch.28 >SIP: [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
