On 08/02/2026 05:54, Robert Skedgell (OSM) wrote:
Where we have highway=cycleway ways explicitly signed as being for cycles only, tagging of foot access in practice and the wiki are a little inconsistent.In your forum post on this, you linked to the relevant OSM Wiki page. Did you spot the footnote on that page that says "Before tagging as foot=no please check that there is a convenient alternative route for pedestrians nearby (e.g. a footway or road)"? People following that principle could explain a lot of apparent inconsistency.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
