> In response to why the boundary line is not visible, I'm not sure but > the lines I have seen are just marked as 'boundary=adminstrative', > nothing else. e.g. for way 433778075. > > Also most boundaries are marked as a relation, not as a way. And then > the relation should be named.
I guess boundary mapping is still a work in progress by local mappers, I see that WARD XI on way 433781627[1] will become a boundary relation like Velur Ward VI[2]. @manoj: btw, great project with NSS volunteers. Hope they will continue to map. :) [1]https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433781627 [2]https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6526524
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
