On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:53:47 +0100, iiizio iiizio wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Simone Cortesi <sim...@cortesi.com> wrote: > > ciao, > > > > http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details > > > > sono disponibili in potlatch le immagini di BING. > > > > è online anche il documento di "concessione", lo sto ancora leggendo... > > Ho letto giusto? Solo editor on-line? Niente Josm?
Avevo anch'io questi dubbi, poi ho trovato questo su josm-devel: The Bing ToUs are a little awkwardly written in places. I'm going to be talking to their lawyer guy but two things you might query: - "online editor" does not exclude JOSM. I've had this confirmed by a guy at Microsoft, they're using it in the sense of "edits an online resource" rather than "an app hosted only on a website" - "non-commercial editor" means, AIUI (haven't confirmed this), they don't want it in saleable products like the ArcGIS extension. This might mean that your Bing config string has to sit in a non-GPLed file. Alternatively you could read "non-commercial editor" as "source code must always be available for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution", i.e. it's ok as long as you're not _only_ selling it (this would accord with a definition elsewhere in the ToU). I honestly don't know. I'll see if I can get this clarified. Quindi JOSM è ok. Ho passato una stringa (in canale) per usare le immagini con JOSM, ma le tile servite, pur essendo quelle di Bing, mancano di tutte le attribuzioni necessarie. Quindi non la passerò qui, e pregherei fradeve, buluca e malgar di non usarla :) David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
