Just tested the recent map with Maps.me, road shields look consistent and great now. Thanks Richards!
Ilya > 21 дек. 2017 г., в 3:26, Rihards <ric...@nakts.net> написал(а): > > On 2017.12.21. 00:41, Rihards wrote: >> On 2017.07.11. 19:32, Rihards wrote: >>> On 2017.07.11. 18:54, Ilya Zverev wrote: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I have been investigating the strange case with road shield in maps.me. In >>>> Latvia they are duplicated in different colors: >>>> >>>> http://not.textual.ru/zverik/2/4/latvian-shields.jpg >>>> >>>> Turns out, in route relations for roads you use network=lv:national for >>>> both A and P roads and network=lv:regional for V roads. But in >>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Latvia#M.C4.93r.C4.B7i P >>>> roads are called regional and V are local. So basically A and P roads are >>>> indistinguishable by their network tag, which strips it of meaning. >>>> >>>> Should I disable parsing road relations for Latvia, or is it possible to >>>> fix this issue by retagging all the relations or inventing a new network >>>> value for A roads? >>> >>> thanks a lot for spotting this. does not look right - A & P should not >>> be at the same level. >>> >>> we should probably change P to lv:regional and V to lv:local >>> >>> opinions ? >> >> looks like we haven't had any objections for 5 months, i started looking >> into this change. discovered some V roads marked as network:national - >> this won't be a trivial automated edit, will need a bit more manual >> attention. still in progress. > > this is completed now. verification would be appreciated. > > Ilya, does this resolve the issue with the relation parsing ? > >>>> Ilya-- >>> Rihards-- >> Rihards > -- > Rihards _______________________________________________ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv
